Send a link Embed Folder options

Views▼

Case Law

3rd Court of Appeals on FLDS Children

4-16-03 Greendale Baptist Church and Academy vs Heck, Wichman..

07-6107 qualified immunity denied

9th Circuit Says Public Defender Can Be Sued

20031003_underwood-c

ALFORD v. HANER Police officers were not entitled to qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claim

Analysis of Swett v

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE, American Civil Liberties Union & American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, IN OPPOSITION TO RELATOR’S PETITION FOR MANDAMUS

browkaw _v_mercer_

Burton v. Richmond --Social Workers do not have Qualified Immunity

CALABRETTA v FLOYD

Camburn_vs_Smith_and_Biebel

Case law against the attacks of CPS

Caselaw to use in court, support your case, exercise your rights

Common Errors By Pro Se Parents When Mailing Motions To The Judge

Cooper_v_Aspen_Skiing

CPS vs FLDS 03-08-00235-CV Third Court of Appeals

Crawford update

Domestic Violence is NOT maltreatment or harm to a child

DUE PROCESS RIGHTS

Dupuy v Samuels ...Pending Petition for Certiorari

dupuy_v_mcewen-07-1075-Cato Institute brief supporting fundamental parental rights v DCFS, pre-emptive safety plans are UNCONSTITUTIONAL

dupuy_v_samuels_and_ill_dcfs

Erika K. v. Brett D. , No. A116590 4-10-08

In re Antonio G., No

In re Kentron D....inadmissibility of hearsay

In re Kentron D

In Re Latifa K.

In RE THE DEPENDENCY OF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS--5-29-08--On Petition for Mandamus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS..Roe_v_Texas

J.B. v. Washington County

Janet I. Fisher vs every crooked actor in the US

Jones v Gallagher

K.C. v. Nedelkoff - Class Action Complaint For Declaratory And Injunctive Relief

KC v Nedelkoff - Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification And Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Class Certification

Keller v Keller

LEHMAN v. LYCOMING COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Loudermilk_9-28-07

Loudermilk_v_Arpaio_No_CV06-0636-PHX-EHC

Mabe v. San Bernardino County..Social worker may be liable for unlawful removal of child from home

Miranda_v_Clark_County_NV

N. A. A. C. P. v BUTTON, 371 US

Notice of Intent to Sue must be filed within 180 days

Nov 30 1998 Motion for Discovery.. usa_v_mitnick

Parents are to be presumed fit and competent under Troxel and not have to prove fitness. Burden of proof always been state's

Patel v. Searles..THE RIGHT TO INTIMATE FAMILY ASSOCIATION

People v Michael John Marsden

PIERCE v. SOCIETY OF THE SISTERS

Poverty Is No Basis to Assert Juvenile Court Jurisdiction

Presumption of Fitness and Due Process Was the Issue in Troxel v. Granville

Roe v. Texas Dept. of Protective & Regulatory Serv.

Rosenstock's Section 1983 Civil Rights Digest

Roska V Peterson

Santosky_v_Kramer

Section 1983 Litigation

Smith v. Williams-Ash, No. 06-4638 March 26, 2008

smith_v_williams-ash

State Ex Rel Proffit

State of Ohio v Adaranijo

stricklin_v_oklahoma

Stumbo-North_Carolina

Supreme Court of Texas Orders 05_29_2008 rules against CPS in FLDS matter

The Supreme Court of Texas _ Orders & Opinions against CPS in FLDS

TROXEL et vir. v. GRANVILLE

U.S. Constitution With the Declaration of Independence

U.S. SUPREME CASES FOR FAMILIES

Underwood case--Jury trial demanded

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -- wen_ho_lee_discovery

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v WEN HO LEE

Violation of Constitutional Rights

Walker v. City of Orem

Windows Live SkyDrive

Go to your SkyDrive or sign up for an account.